Skip Navigation

# Int. Journal for Quality in Health Care

# The Relationship Between Meeting Patients' Information Needs and their Satisfaction with Hospital Care and General Health Status Outcomes

1. CELIA O. LARSON 1,*†,
2. EUGENE C. NELSON‡,
3. DAVID GUSTAFSON§ and
4. PAUL B. BATALDEN‡

- Received December 27, 1995.
- Accepted June 4, 1996.

## Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine if there is an association between meeting patients' information needs and their overall satisfaction with care and their general health status outcomes.

Study design: This non-experimental study used data from hospital medical records as well as patient-completed surveys conducted two and eight weeks post discharge. The setting involved three community hospitals in the southeastern section of the US that provided care to a series of 167 acute myocardial infarction (Acute MI) patients.

Measures: The independent variable was an index measuring how well patients' information needs were met. The dependent variables were patient satisfaction (ratings of satisfaction with care process, global satisfaction, and health benefit) and general health status outcomes (physical function, psychosocial function and quality of life). Covariates used as control variables to hold patient characteristics constant, included demographics (age, gender) and clinical measures of acute MI severity, comorbidity, angina (at eight weeks), and dyspnea (at eight weeks).

Analysis: Univariate analyses were employed to: (1) describe patients' characteristics; (2) determine the relative importance of meeting different types of information needs; and (3) identify information need areas most likely not to be met. Multivariate linear regression and logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between patients' ratings of meeting information needs with satisfaction and health outcomes, respectively, after controlling for covariates.

Results: The multivariate regression results show that meeting information needs are positively and significantly associated with both patient satisfaction measures (i.e. Ratings of Care Processes, p < 0.01; Global Satisfaction, p < 0.05, Perceived Health Benefit, p < 0.01) and one general health status measure (i.e. Quality of Life, p < 0.01).

Conclusion: The results suggest that providers of care should ensure that they meet the information needs of patients with specific conditions because patients' perceptions of both quality of care and quality of life are associated with the clinicians' ability to transfer key information to their patients. Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd.

- © 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd.

### This Article

1. Int J Qual Health Care (1996) 8 (5): 447-456. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/8.5.447

1. » Abstract Free
2. Full Text (PDF)Free

#### Classifications

1. - Article

#### Services

1. Alert me when cited
2. Alert me if corrected
3. Find similar articles
4. Similar articles in Web of Science
5. Similar articles in PubMed
6. Add to my archive
7. Download citation
8. Request Permissions

#### Citing Articles

1. Load citing article information
2. Citing articles via CrossRef
3. Citing articles via Scopus
4. Citing articles via Web of Science
5. Citing articles via Google Scholar

#### Google Scholar

1. Articles by LARSON, C. O.
2. Articles by BATALDEN, P. B.
3. Search for related content

#### PubMed

1. PubMed citation
2. Articles by LARSON, C. O.
3. Articles by BATALDEN, P. B.

#### Related Content

1. Load related web page information

#### Share

1. Email this article
2. - CiteULike
   - Connotea
   - Delicious
   - Facebook
   - Google+
   - Mendeley
   - Twitter

   What's this?

#### People also read [Beta]

- What's this?

## The Journal

- About this journal
- Publishers' Books for Review
- Rights & Permissions
- Dispatch date of the next issue
- We are mobile – find out more

### Published on behalf of

- The International Society for Quality in Health Care

### Impact factor: 2.064

### 5-Yr impact factor: 2.402

### Editor-in-Chief

#### Eric Schneider

- View full editorial board

## For Authors

- Instructions to authors
- Online submission
- Submit Now!
- Call for Papers: East Asia Health Care
- Self archiving policy

Open Access options for authors - visit Oxford Open

- This journal enables compliance with the NIH Public Access Policy

## Alerting Services

- Email table of contents
- Email Advance Access
- CiteTrack
- XML RSS feed

## Corporate Services

- Advertising sales
- Reprints
- Supplements

### Most

- #### Most Read

  1. Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research
  2. Implementing culture change in health care: theory and practice
  3. The advantages and disadvantages of process-based measures of health care quality
  4. Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement
  5. Writing a research article: advice to beginners
  » View all Most Read articles

- #### Most Cited

  1. Handoff strategies in settings with high consequences for failure: lessons for health care operations
  2. The JCAHO patient safety event taxonomy: a standardized terminology and classification schema for near misses and adverse events
  3. Process versus outcome indicators in the assessment of quality of health care
  4. How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies
  5. Evidence of self-report bias in assessing adherence to guidelines
  » View all Most Cited articles

Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.